On October 16, 2013, Ann Coulter published an article “It Depends On
What The Meaning of ‘Settled Law’ is”, about discussing the situation of
refusing Obamacare and taking the negative sides of this decision. The author
took a lot of examples about how this new system would not have a good impact
on the people not only to the Congress, such as “New York electing Bill de
Blasio as Mayer” or and “Bill
Clinton's signature legislative achievement -- Midnight Basketball for the
Homeless” consequences. Although the Author sounds like a Republican’s
proponents, but she brought some good points about the Obama health Care and
why the republicans stood against it. I as an individual agree with the author
for her critique about the Obama health care. Not all the people can afford to
pay for health care. As the Democratic called the ObamaCare as a “settled Law”
but it is not in many people benefit. Since the health care fist time applied
to State of Massachusetts on a Democratic decision, liberal Massachusetts
people elected a Republican senator solely because his vow to vote against Obamacare.
The Republicans are would not let this issue pass without stopping it because
it is against the people wish, so the Democrats should not apply a law that is
been refused by the people and it is against their volition. It is true that
the Democrats have won the election because many of us have voted for them for
believing in their wise judgment and great leadership; however, sometimes there
should be a wide study for each decision they make for America’s citizens
before setting a law in regarding to, that should study all aspects of this law
before setting it.
No comments:
Post a Comment